I decided I would like to make knowledge accessible to my children.
I did this when I decided to spend the mind-blowing $108.00 on a subscription to the magazine History Today. I think I do not have to explain why this is such a big decision.
My problem, at its root, is not the cost; I find the publication incredibly helpful, not only in research, but just because I enjoy reading it. I will gladly pay $108.00 for a subscription to something that enhances my research, and deepens my pool of knowledge.
What I take issue with is the fact that it will cost me $108.00 to gain knowledge and perspective academically, and yet I can purchase a two year subscription to Cosmopolitan for just "$1 per Issue!", or so their website advertises. For a mere $28.00 I can learn exactly what makes him tick/squirm/squeal, and keep up on the very latest fashion trends out of Milan, for a whole two years. For less than thirty dollars, I can immerse myself in feeling like a woman every - single - day. And by "feel like a woman" I mean to say that I can compare myself to every woman in that magazine and come up feeling worthless, look at all the items I can't afford and wind up feeling like a financial failure, and peruse through all the articles and come out the other side no more knowledgeable about how to actually have healthy relationships than I was prior to reading.
Why the disparity? And what does this say to our children?
Well, I haven't officially researched it, and I don't have any truly sound academic arguments as of yet - anthropologically, historically or otherwise - but I'm still pretty confident in my answer: because our priorities are seriously effed up. And yes, that's my official, academic answer.
With the cost of academic texts so high, and the cost of magazines like Cosmo so low, is it any wonder our children are confused? We show them, in myriad ways, what they should be prioritizing high on their list. We feed them a constant barrage of toys and tinkers in commercials, plug the Christmas tree with enough gifts to make a Sudanese child die of shock, and then proceed to leave our choice of reading materials out on the coffee table.
Some may say that I'm being overly harsh on those publications I've mentioned, and may point out, embarrassingly, that my mouth is unzipped and my bias is showing. Speaking directly to that, I would agree that these publications do have value. As with most anything, I believe its how we use the tool that defines the tool. Viewing anything - including entertainment or fashion publications - with a critical eye and yearning to understand can only enhance us as thinking creatures. For example, viewing Vogue from an academic, anthropological standpoint can provide incredible perspective on our treatment of gender in the West; author Beth Harbison produced an illuminating work, Hope in a Jar, which covers the history of women's beauty products - and it's a fascinating work. The magazines and editorials themselves are not the problem; how our children - and how we ourselves - receive and process the information, and what we use those texts for, are the issues.
We parents in this country, in good portion it would appear, are unconcerned whether our children know who Shakespeare is, let alone whether they can name even one of his works. Educating our children on why Salvador Dali was so revolutionary is low on the 'to do' list, and introducing them to History (yes, you all know this is what appalls me the most) in any form is about as high on parents' list of priorities as 'change the oil in the car.' And even that at least gets done when it can't be put off any longer. And I have been just as guilty as anyone else.
I see this as one of those root problems in society for which there is no quick-acting elixir. In our current culture, pop culture is valued higher than education and critical thinking, for the most part. I must acknowledge that this does not apply to everyone; I have met parents who take a very proactive stance on their children's education. Yet, the majority are more focused on tangible, applied knowledge, than they are conceptual or theoretical knowledge. I do not blame the parents, truthfully; indeed, blame itself seems fairly inconsequential. What we need instead of blame, instead of pointing fingers and judging, is to understand the problem so that we can address it.
"The problem" is problematically condensed, but I cannot speak to "the problem" in less than two thousand words. What I've brought up here is just a tiny speck of the overall "problem". I am neither educated enough, or arrogant enough, to tackle the job of actually outlining what "the problem" is. Instead, I write about this today to ask myself - and any one of you reading - what signals am I sending to my children about what is important? How likely is it that my child will fall in love with education, if I do not make it fun, relevant, and most importantly, accessible to them?
It cost me $108.00 to have History Today delivered to me in my medium of choice. I will gladly pay the $15.00 each for one year subscriptions to National Geographic, and National Geographic Kids. I will keep every textbook I have purchased for school, and leave them in the bookcase that is most accessible to my kids. I will get on the computer with my five-year-old and show her the great masterpieces of the Renaissance, as well as the works of great contemporary artists. I will read her poetry - both of the goose sort, and also the Blake, Whitman, and Shakespeare sort. I will value her literacy above all kindergarten academic pursuits, and my husband will teach her that math and science are not to be feared, but embraced and questioned.
Mostly, I will value these things myself, and eschew the urge to pick up that newest issue of Vogue at the grocery store.
And, if I'm very lucky, and my and my husband's love of knowledge and critical thinking take root within our children and grow, one of my daughters will shake their head firmly at me while I am in that grocery line, take the fashion magazine out of my hand, and parrot to me just as I have a thousand times about candy bars, "No, Mama - you don't need that. You can read History Today when we get home, if you continue to choose good behavior."
I will conclude by acknowledging that Our Culture Sucks: Why Our Children Are Getting Dumber is not a sound academic thesis. It is, however (I think) a perfectly sound question for us to be asking ourselves, so that we, as parents and educators, can provide to the newest generations easy access to knowledge, and more difficult access to consumerism and trend.
